Total Drek

Or, the thoughts of several frustrated intellectuals on Sociology, Gaming, Science, Politics, Science Fiction, Religion, and whatever the hell else strikes their fancy. There is absolutely no reason why you should read this blog. None. Seriously. Go hit your back button. It's up in the upper left-hand corner of your browser... it says "Back." Don't say we didn't warn you.

Monday, December 18, 2006

Balance

Recently, a commenter brought a particular issue to my attention: that I am, perhaps, a bit unbalanced in my treatment of genitalia. Specifically, the commenter remarked in response to a recent post about penises:

I feel I must call you on your propensity to show actual pictures when discussing female sex organs, but not including pictures like this when discussing male sex organs. I think it only fair... - A Non-Impartial Reader [Link original]


Loathe as I am to admit it, I have to concede that this commenter has a point. I have, from time to time, written about parts of the female anatomy, and have lovingly provided links. Hell, I've even written about breasts on other blogs. As the commenter pointed out, however, I have fallen down on the job when it comes to the male anatomy. I wrote an entire post dealing with penises and barely provided any links.

Now, one might argue that my failure was an effort to maintain good taste but- as regular readers of this blog know- that can't possibly be the explanation.* The reality is I just don't have as much prurient interest in penises as I have in breasts. As a result, my "coverage" of this area has been somewhat lacking. I suppose it's also the case that, really, I thought that I was enough of a cock to suffice for the site. So, starting here, I will make an effort to compensate for this lack-of-balance by including a set of links in any given post dealing with the female body that point to images of men in various states of undress. This will, in all likelihood, prove to be quite easy as there are a variety of pictures of men and penises available.

For example, there are cartoon penises:



Comparative penises:



Comparatively large penises:



Comparatively small penises:



And even penises made out of cake:



I even discovered that a search on Google Images for "flacid penises" turns up some rather unexpected results. I rather think these are a consequence of what I now think of as the Shannon Elizabth Postulate.** namely, that virtually any search on google images will, given sufficient time, yield porn.***

So, ladies and gentlemen from here on in you can look forward to a greater abundance of penises than ever before.

I'm sure you can hardly wait.




* I mean, seriously, have you even read my blog?

** The name derives from the footnotes to this post.

*** There's an addition to this postulate that more or less reads, "Especially if this search is being conducted by Drek on behalf of his readers."

4 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

I appreciate the "coverage." Not because I'm incredibly taken with either breasts or penises, but because of the principle of gender equity. Thank you for taking my comment seriously. - Aforementioned Non-Impartial Reader

Monday, December 18, 2006 10:59:00 AM  
Blogger Dan Myers said...

Can you give us the soy intake for each of these exemplars? I'm trying to figure out which ones are gay!

Tuesday, December 19, 2006 9:52:00 AM  
Blogger Drek said...

Hey Dan,

Well, it never really occurred to me to wonder about that. I suppose I could open it up to a reader poll but I shudder to consider what criteria people might use to judge.

I'm fairly sure the cake is ambivalent about its sexual partners, though.

Always nice, by the way, to know I have department chairs reading the blog...

And by "nice" I mean "vaguely unsettling."

Tuesday, December 19, 2006 10:32:00 AM  
Blogger Dan Myers said...

Well, You have someone named Tina to blame! She pointed out on someone else's blog that you scooped me by something like 4 days on the Jim-Rutz-Soy-Makes-You-Gay-with-a-Small-Penis story. So I came to see, and voila, even more penis coverage, or uncoverage, as the case may be!

Tuesday, December 19, 2006 1:59:00 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Site Meter